<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>The Systems Thinker</provider_name><provider_url>https://thesystemsthinker.com</provider_url><author_name>Philip Ramsey</author_name><author_url>https://thesystemsthinker.com/author/philip-ramsey/</author_url><title>The Structure of Paradox: Managing Interdependent Opposites - The Systems Thinker</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="vyGRp4sY5g"&gt;&lt;a href="https://thesystemsthinker.com/the-structure-of-paradox-managing-interdependent-opposites/"&gt;The Structure of Paradox: Managing Interdependent Opposites&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://thesystemsthinker.com/the-structure-of-paradox-managing-interdependent-opposites/embed/#?secret=vyGRp4sY5g" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;The Structure of Paradox: Managing Interdependent Opposites&#x201D; &#x2014; The Systems Thinker" data-secret="vyGRp4sY5g" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://thesystemsthinker.com/wp-content/uploads/images/ln-products/Screen Shot 2014-08-19 at 11.08.23 AM.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>566</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>291</thumbnail_height><description>hen faced with a problem, how often do teams within your organization become polarized around proposed solutions that are opposites? For example, one group of people may be convinced that the only way to increase productivity is through greater teamwork, while another group may advocate better management of individuals as the best method for bringing [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
